
The capital of Siam from the fourteenth to the eighteenth century, burned by the Burmese in 1767. What is left of the city are brick prangs and rows of headless Buddhas, in a historical park on the UNESCO list.
Ayutthaya is the ruin of the Siamese capital that stood here from the middle of the fourteenth century until 1767, when a Burmese army took the city and burned it. It was never rebuilt: the new capital was founded downstream at Bangkok, and on the site of the old one there remains a historical park of brick chedis, prangs and rows of headless Buddhas. This is the most logical day trip out of Bangkok, about 80 kilometres to the north.
The city was founded in 1350 by King Ramathibodi I on an island formed by three rivers, the Chao Phraya, the Pasak and the Lopburi. Over more than four centuries Ayutthaya grew into one of the largest cities in the world of its time, with Portuguese, Japanese, Dutch and French quarters. The destruction of 1767 was total: the wooden palaces burned down, the statues were stripped for their gold and the heads of the Buddhas were knocked off. What you see is a brick skeleton without plaster and with almost no sculpture. The historical park has been on the UNESCO list since 1991.
There are several dozen sites. A sensible set for one day is this:
Individual temples charge admission, around 50 baht to enter; there is a single ticket for the main sites that pays for itself from roughly the fourth temple onwards. Hours are generally from 8 to 18, and some of them are lit up in the evening.
Most people come for a single day from Bangkok: an early start and four or five temples at a brisk pace. Staying the night in Ayutthaya is noticeably better, because you get sunrise and sunset in the park, when the coaches are gone and the heat lets up. Two days are worth allowing for the sake of the national museum, a boat trip around the island and the more distant sites.
The main enemy here is the sun: there is almost no shade in the park and the brick bakes. Plan your sightseeing from eight to eleven and after three, and give the middle of the day to the museum or to lunch. Clothing has to be modest, covering shoulders and knees, and that rule applies at the ruins too.
Ayutthaya comes down to brick. If you are not ready to take pleasure in foundations, stupas and fragments with no gilding and no interiors, fatigue will set in by the third temple: from the outside they look alike, and the difference is visible only to someone with an interest in history. There is no picturesque "ancient city" with streets and houses here, as the ruins stand like islands in the middle of an ordinary Thai provincial town with its traffic and its wires. Nor is this a place for a rest: heat, dust and constant journeys. For those going to Thailand for the sea and for idleness, it is more honest to stick to the temples of Bangkok.